Hi Max,

The idea was to keep all the Hex functions together.

Its a bit of a mismatch with StringBuilder; StringBuilder doesn't deal with arrays and is pretty bulky as it is. And StringBuilder doesn't have a corresponding parse companion; the string to byte[] array functions are needed to.

True, the prefix and suffix are conveniences and could be removed. By knowing it them as part of the encode operation it is possible to allocate the buffer exactly.

Thanks, Roger


On 8/20/20 3:02 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
How about StringBuilder::appendHex instead of Encoder::encode(SB, byte[])? Then 
we don’t need to break the chain when appending many different things to a 
StringBuilder.

Also, are prefix and suffix really useful? One can easily add them.

Thanks,
Max

On Aug 19, 2020, at 5:14 PM, Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com> wrote:

Please review a java.util.Hex API to encode and decode hexadecimal strings to 
and from byte arrays.

Within the JDK and JDK tests there are multiple implementations to encode and 
decode
hexadecimal strings to byte arrays. Hex encoders and decoders support
upper or lower case hexadecimal characters, delimiters, prefix, and suffix.
The API is modeled after the java.util.Base64 API providing static factories,
immutable threadsafe instances with methods to encode to and decode from
string and StringBuilder.

JavaDoc:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/hex-javadoc/java.base/java/util/Hex.html

Webrev for Hex encoder and decoder:
    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-hex-encoder-8251989

Webrev for applying to java.security:
    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-hex-security-8252055

CSR:
    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251991

Issue for API and a few uses:
    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251989

Issue for Use in java.security and tests:
    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252055


Reply via email to