On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:52:15 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> 1. I agree that it's awkward and I'm not a huge fan. I'm okay doing it this >> way, but this is recreating the reproducer >> for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252730 which is two identical >> JDK's in different directories. I can >> document this in the test further or we can change it. 2-4: Noted. Will >> clean these up and loop back. Thanks! > > Whatever is easiest but 2 x copy tree would be simpler and the result should > be two identical JDKs as reported in > JDK-8252730. I misunderstood what you meant when I read it earlier today, apologies! The new changes should address these enumerated issues. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/156
