On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:56:50 GMT, Lance Andersen <lan...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Volker Simonis has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous
>> commits have been removed. The incremental
>> views will show differences compared to the previous content of the PR.
>
> test/jdk/java/util/zip/CopyZipFile.java line 104:
>
>> 102: // all these fields set to '-1'.
>> 103: InputStream is = new FileInputStream(ZIP_FILE);
>> 104: ZipInputStream zis = new ZipInputStream(is);
>
> Any reason not to include the the ZipInputStream and InputStream in the try
> with Resources and the ZipFile below? I
> know these are nits, but just curious or was it an over site?
> I think we are good otherwise
No other reason except my laziness :)
> test/jdk/java/util/zip/CopyZipFile.java line 140:
>
>> 138: // This means that all ZipEntry objects returned from ZipFile
>> will have correct
>> 139: // settings for these fields.
>> 140: // I the compression level was different in the initial zip
>> file (which we can't find
>
> typo I -> If
Fixed
> test/jdk/java/util/zip/CopyZipFile.java line 188:
>
>> 186: if ("test1.txt".equals(entry.getName()) ||
>> "test2.txt".equals(entry.getName())) {
>> 187: throw new Exception(
>> 188: "Should throw for STORED files or files
>> compressed with DEFAULT_COMPRESSION");
>
> Perhaps clean up the message above "Should throw" to indicate what is being
> thrown
Thanks. That should actually red "Shouldn't...". Fixed that and also added
ZipExcpetion as exception which shouldn't be
thrown.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/520
