On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:44:10 GMT, Stuart Marks <sma...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> 8231547: Serializable class doc should link to serialization specification > > Rewrite a couple confusing sentences in the Serializable class doc. This does > affect normative text, but the edits are primarily to focus and clarify the > text, not to make any semantic changes. Thus, a CSR request shouldn't be > required for this change. > > Also add and adjust some links and link markup to the Java Object > Serialization Specification. src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Serializable.java line 48: > 46: * It is possible for subtypes of non-serializable classes to be > serialized > 47: * and deserialized. During serialization, no data will be written for the > 48: * fields of non-serializable classes. During deserialization, the fields > of " fields of non-serializable classes" - this strictly means " fields of non-serializable SUPERclasses", right? src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Serializable.java line 49: > 47: * and deserialized. During serialization, no data will be written for the > 48: * fields of non-serializable classes. During deserialization, the fields > of > 49: * non-serializable classes will be initialized using the no-arg > constructor of non-serializable SUPERclasses .. src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Serializable.java line 50: > 48: * fields of non-serializable classes. During deserialization, the fields > of > 49: * non-serializable classes will be initialized using the no-arg > constructor of > 50: * the class. This constructor must be accessible to the subclass that is > being .. of the first non-serializable superclass. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1306
