On 11/24/20 3:18 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
Hi Mandy,
given that almost nobody knows about sealed packages, i'm not sure that adding
a reference to Package::isSealed in Class::isSealed actually helps, it might be
confusing.
It's even better if the API note in `Class::isSealed` from PR is removed:
* This method reports on a distinct concept of sealing from
* {@link Package#isSealed() Package::isSealed}.
I'm good with that. Alan and I saw the proposed API note and just feel
it adds more confusion than helping (My comment is meant to be on
Class::isSealed but now I realized the comment is on Package::isSealed.
sorry for the confusion.)
Mandy
