On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 06:50:14 GMT, Stuart Marks <sma...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> This rewrites the doc of ArraysSupport.newLength, adds detail to the 
> exception message, and adds a test. In addition to some renaming and a bit of 
> refactoring of the actual code, I also made two changes of substance to the 
> code:
> 
> 1. I fixed a problem with overflow checking. In the original code, if 
> oldLength and prefGrowth were both very large (say, Integer.MAX_VALUE), this 
> method could return a negative value. It turns out that writing tests helps 
> find bugs!
> 
> 2. Under the old policy, if oldLength and minGrowth required a length above 
> SOFT_MAX_ARRAY_LENGTH but not above Integer.MAX_VALUE, this method would 
> return Integer.MAX_VALUE. That doesn't make any sense, because attempting to 
> allocate an array of that length will almost certainly cause the Hotspot to 
> throw OOME because its implementation limit was exceeded. Instead, if the 
> required length is in this range, this method returns that required length.
> 
> Separately, I'll work on retrofitting various call sites around the JDK to 
> use this method.

src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/util/ArraysSupport.java line 626:

> 624:      * attempt an array allocation with that length and encounter an 
> OutOfMemoryError.
> 625:      * Of course, regardless of the length value returned from this 
> method, the caller
> 626:      * may encounter OutOfMemoryError if there is insufficient heap to 
> fufill the request.

typo in line 626: fufill -> fulfill

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1617

Reply via email to