On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:26:04 GMT, Thomas Schatzl <tscha...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review this change that eliminates the use of Reference.isEnqueued by
>> tests.  There were three tests using it:
>> 
>> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/ReferencesGC/ReferencesGC.java
>> vmTestbase/gc/gctests/WeakReferenceGC/WeakReferenceGC.java
>> jdk/java/lang/ref/ReferenceEnqueue.java
>> 
>> In each of them, some combination of using Reference.refersTo and
>> ReferenceQueue.remove with a timeout were used to eliminate the use of
>> Reference.isEnqueued.
>> 
>> I also cleaned up ReferencesGC.java in various respects.  It contained
>> several bits of dead code, and the failure checks were made stronger.
>> 
>> Testing:
>> mach5 tier1
>> Locally (linux-x64) ran all three tests with each GC (including Shenandoah).
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/gc/gctests/ReferencesGC/ReferencesGC.java line 
> 129:
> 
>> 127:                 }
>> 128: 
>> 129:                 int REMOVE = (int) (RANGE * RATIO);
> 
> These two constants could be factored out as static finals to match the 
> casing.

I'm making REMOVE and RETAIN statics, near RANGE and RATIO.  (Meant to do that 
before, but forgot.)  They can't be final though, because RANGE and RATIO 
aren't final, and can be set from command line arguments.  So they'll get 
initialized in parseArgs.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1691

Reply via email to