On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:56:01 GMT, Andy Herrick <herr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> test/jdk/tools/jpackage/share/jdk/jpackage/tests/NoMPathRuntimeTest.java
>> line 125:
>>
>>> 123: .addArguments("-cvf", "junk.jar",
>>> 124: "-C", tmpdir.toString(), "Hello.class")
>>> 125: .execute();
>>
>> Single line `HelloApp.createBundle("junk.jar:Hello", tmpdir);` would compile
>> source class and put it into "junk.jar" in `tmpdir` folder. It can be used
>> to replace lines from [109, 125] range.
>>
>> What is the point to build "junk.jar"? I don't see how it is used in the
>> test.
>
> The bug is that when --module-path option is not used in a modular app,
> jpackage uses a module-path with "." on it.
> Having a non-modular jar in the modular path is an error.
> So with this non-modular Hello.jar in the current directory the jpackage
> command failed before the fix, and succeeds after the fix.
>
> I can create the non-modular Hello.jar in the current directory with one line:
> HelloApp.createBundle(JavaAppDesc.parse("junk.jar:Hello"), Path.of("."))
Another precondition for the test is that Java runtime used with jpackage
command should include module with app main class, right?
Test arguments are: `List.of("Hello", "com.foo/com.foo.main.Aloha");`. The
first argument is non-modular app, it is not used with jlink. What is the point
to run the test for non-modular app?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2781
