On Fri, 21 May 2021 16:09:45 GMT, Chris Hegarty <che...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Simplify factory interface to BinaryOperator<ObjectInputFilter> and 
>> cleanup the example
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/ObjectInputFilter.java line 107:
> 
>> 105:  *     Note that the filter may be used directly or combined with other 
>> filters by the
>> 106:  *     {@linkplain Config#setSerialFilterFactory(BinaryOperator) 
>> JVM-wide filter factory}.
>> 107:  * </ul>
> 
> This list is a little confusing to me, but could be that I don't fully grok 
> it yet. getSerialFilterFactory returns THE JVM-wide factory, whether that be 
> the built-in factory implementation or not is somewhat irrelevant. No need to 
> treat them differently - one either sets a factory (in which case that is the 
> JVM-wide factory), or one does not set the factory (in which case the 
> built-in factory is the JVM-wide factory).

In previous versions, calling OIS.setObjectInputFilter determined exactly the 
filter used for the stream.
With the filter factory enhancement, the current filter factory determines how 
the argument to OIS.setObjectInputFilter is used. There are plenty of cases 
where the filter factory will combine it with other filters and the composite 
will becomes the filter for the stream.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3996

Reply via email to