On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 09:30:40 GMT, Jaroslav Tulach
<[email protected]> wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be much support for the complete changes in #4245. To
> get at least something useful from that endeavor I have extracted the test
> for existing behavior of `-XX:+PreserveAllAnnotations` and I am offering it
> in this pull request without any changes to the JVM behavior.
test/jdk/java/lang/annotation/AnnotationType/AnnotationTypeChangedToRuntimeTest.java
line 81:
> 79: " should not be visible at runtime");
> 80: }
> 81: }
I'm trying to understand why the case of
`TestTask.class.getDeclaredAnnotation(AnnA_v1.class)` is different from
`AnnB.class.getDeclaredAnnotation(AnnA_v1.class)` ... `TestTask` and `AnnB` are
both just types annotated with the same annotation `@AnnA_v1` ... I'll have to
debug this to see the point (does it have something to do with the fact that
there is circularity of annotation uses: `AnnA_v1` is annotated with `@AnnB`
while `AnnB` is annotated with `@AnnA_v1` ?
test/jdk/java/lang/annotation/AnnotationType/AnnotationTypeChangedToRuntimeTest.java
line 102:
> 100: */
> 101: static class AltClassLoader extends ClassLoader {
> 102: AltClassLoader(ClassLoader parent) {
I can't escape the feeling that I already saw this code somewhere. Hm... ;-)
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4280
