On Sun, 30 May 2021 17:30:56 GMT, Markus KARG 
<github.com+1701815+mk...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> This PR-*draft* is **work in progress** and an invitation to discuss a 
> possible solution for issue 
> [JDK-8265891](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265891). It is *not 
> yet* intended for a final review.
> 
> As proposed in JDK-8265891, this PR provides an implementation for 
> `Channels.newInputStream().transferTo()` which provide superior performance 
> compared to the current implementation. The changes are:
> * Prevents transfers through the JVM heap as much as possibly by offloading 
> to deeper levels via NIO, hence allowing the operating system to optimize the 
> transfer.
> * Using more JRE heap in the fallback case when no NIO is possible (still 
> only KiBs, hence mostl ynegligible even on SBCs) to better perform on modern 
> hardware / fast I/O devides.
> 
> Using JMH I have benchmarked both, the original implementation and this 
> implementation, and (depending on the used hardware and use case) performance 
> change was approx. doubled performance. So this PoC proofs that it makes 
> sense to finalize this work and turn it into an actual OpenJDK contribution. 
> 
> I encourage everybody to discuss this draft:
> * Are there valid arguments for *not* doing this change?
> * Is there a *better* way to improve performance of 
> `Channels.newInputStream().transferTo()`?
> * How to go on from here: What is missing to get this ready for an actual 
> review?

I am a bit lost currently. So what actually do I have to do next? You want *me* 
to write these tests, or shall I just refactor my implementation and *you* will 
provide these tests (I would prefer that, actually)?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4263

Reply via email to