On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:02:21 GMT, Jorn Vernee <jver...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> How does native code reach a safepoint polling point?
>
> The stack trace looks like this:
> 
> 
> Current thread (0x000002a2489f0b50):  JavaThread "Thread-4551" 
> [_thread_in_Java, id=24920, stack(0x000000d9e0500000,0x000000d9e0600000)]
> 
> Stack: [0x000000d9e0500000,0x000000d9e0600000]
> Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native 
> code)
> V  [jvm.dll+0xae6651]  os::platform_print_native_stack+0xf1  
> (os_windows_x86.cpp:235)
> V  [jvm.dll+0xda3f25]  VMError::report+0x1005  (vmError.cpp:739)
> V  [jvm.dll+0xda58ae]  VMError::report_and_die+0x7fe  (vmError.cpp:1549)
> V  [jvm.dll+0xda5fe4]  VMError::report_and_die+0x64  (vmError.cpp:1330)
> V  [jvm.dll+0x4ceca7]  report_vm_error+0xb7  (debug.cpp:282)
> V  [jvm.dll+0x6511be]  HandleArea::allocate_handle+0x3e  (handles.cpp:35)
> V  [jvm.dll+0xb8e334]  
> ThreadSafepointState::handle_polling_page_exception+0x314  (safepoint.cpp:939)
> C  0x000002a035d8caa7
> 
> Java frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code)
> v  ~SafepointBlob
> J 639 c1 
> java.lang.invoke.LambdaForm$MH+0x000000080101b800.invoke(Ljava/lang/Object;)V 
> java.base@18-internal (87 bytes) @ 0x000002a03635f7b4 
> [0x000002a03635f4a0+0x0000000000000314]
> J 620 c1 
> java.lang.invoke.LambdaForm$MH+0x0000000801018c00.invoke(Ljava/lang/Object;)V 
> java.base@18-internal (37 bytes) @ 0x000002a036353e0c 
> [0x000002a036353720+0x00000000000006ec]
> v  ~BufferBlob::mэYссссЫGў
> 
> 
> So I think the 'native code' is something being called by the safepoint blob, 
> but I'm not sure why it's marked with a `C` instead of `V` in the stack trace 
> (maybe just a stack unwind failure?).
> 
> FWIW, this part has already been fixed as part of: 
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17/pull/173 (not sure why it still shows up in 
> the diff)

Okay so we're not actually _thread_in_native it is just a chunk of VM generated 
code. Something still seems off to me about the need for the HandleMark but 
that isn't your problem.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/149

Reply via email to