Hello. I found a few internal classes in the JDK codebase which don't have proper javadoc, but have dangling javadoc-like comments. Dangling Javadoc comments are ignored by the javadoc tool and IDE. Perhaps it was intentional to not add proper javadoc to them? I believe it's better to convert them to proper javadoc to make developing JDK a bit more friendly within IDE. What do you think?
List of classes: com.sun.beans.editors.BooleanEditor com.sun.beans.editors.ByteEditor com.sun.beans.editors.DoubleEditor com.sun.beans.editors.FloatEditor com.sun.beans.editors.IntegerEditor com.sun.beans.editors.LongEditor com.sun.beans.editors.NumberEditor com.sun.beans.editors.ShortEditor com.sun.jndi.toolkit.dir.ContainmentFilter com.sun.jndi.toolkit.dir.LazySearchEnumerationImpl com.sun.security.auth.module.Crypt java.math.MutableBigInteger java.net.DefaultInterface javax.swing.GraphicsWrapper jdk.internal.access.JavaAWTFontAccess jdk.javadoc.internal.doclets.toolkit.CommentUtils sun.awt.X11.XAtom sun.awt.X11.XAwtState sun.java2d.xr.XRBackend sun.java2d.xr.XRDrawLine sun.jvm.hotspot.debugger.PageCache sun.jvm.hotspot.runtime.JavaThreadFactory sun.jvm.hotspot.utilities.Interval sun.jvm.hotspot.utilities.MessageQueueBackend sun.jvm.hotspot.utilities.RBTree sun.launcher.LauncherHelper sun.net.www.content.text.plain sun.net.www.protocol.file.FileURLConnection sun.nio.ch.Interruptible sun.security.pkcs.ParsingException sun.security.provider.SeedGenerator sun.security.util.ByteArrayTagOrder sun.security.util.IOUtils Andrey Turbanov