On 11/09/2021 5:24 am, kabutz wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:08:05 GMT, Claes Redestad <redes...@openjdk.org> wrote:
This looks good. @cl4es might want to confirm that change was not intentional.
Completely unintentional, and perplexing since it's not a simple copy-paste
error..
The thread priorities in Java are the wrong way round, (high is 10, low is 1)
so I was not surprised by this mistake.
They are not "the wrong way around" they followed Solaris Global
Dispatch Priorities (and Windows priorities for that matter). It makes a
lot more sense than systems where a "higher priority" means a lower
numerical priority value IMO.
:)
Cheers,
David
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5439
