On 11/09/2021 5:24 am, kabutz wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:08:05 GMT, Claes Redestad <redes...@openjdk.org> wrote:

This looks good. @cl4es might want to confirm that change was not intentional.

Completely unintentional, and perplexing since it's not a simple copy-paste 
error..

The thread priorities in Java are the wrong way round, (high is 10, low is 1) 
so I was not surprised by this mistake.

They are not "the wrong way around" they followed Solaris Global Dispatch Priorities (and Windows priorities for that matter). It makes a lot more sense than systems where a "higher priority" means a lower numerical priority value IMO.

:)

Cheers,
David


-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5439

Reply via email to