On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 08:32:02 GMT, Kartik Ohri 
<github.com+27751938+amcap1...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Hi all!
> 
> Please review this PR to add a benchmark comparing the performance of 
> Arrays.mismatch intrinsic in the JDK with that of the Vector API. Kindly 
> refer to this [thread] on panama-dev regarding some initial discussion about 
> this benchmark. I have attached the [results] of the full benchmark run along 
> with the [assembly] output of a shorter run I had done while analysing the 
> results. The benchmarks were run against the latest build of panama-vector 
> available from builds.shipilev.net.
> 
> Also, I have not added the copyright header to this file yet as I am an 
> individual contributor (OCA signed) and do not know what to put there.
> 
> [thread]: 
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/panama-dev/2021-September/014839.html
> [results]: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/files/7142452/results.csv
> [assembly]:  https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/files/7142362/benchmarks.txt
> 
> Regards,
> Kartik

Benchmark looks good (assuming license is added).

test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/jdk/incubator/vector/ArrayMismatchBenchmark.java 
line 52:

> 50:     static final VectorSpecies<Long> LONG_SPECIES_PREFERRED = 
> LongVector.SPECIES_PREFERRED;
> 51: 
> 52:     static final Random random = new Random();

We could use the recently added `RandomGenerator` instead in the spirit of 
encouraging the use of new and preferred APIs:

- remove the static field
- replace `FLOAT_SPECIES` with `DOUBLE_SPECIES`
- in `setup` create an instance `RandomGenerator rg = 
RandomGenerator.getDefault()`
- remove `createRandomFloats` and use `rg.doubles(...).toArray()`

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5459

Reply via email to