On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:49:38 GMT, Michael McMahon <micha...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Or maybe - which would be more accurate:
>>
>>
>> with the given {@code statusCode} and the body bytes' length (or {@code -1}
>> if the body is empty).
>
> I agree with your second suggestion. It's better not to refer to the
> 'Content-Length' header at all.
Indeed more accurate, I'll update to the second suggestion.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5505
