Re: Constant methods in Java

[Aaron Scott-Boddendijk]

There's this, and the fact that it's effectively unenforceable.

String t = ((Supplier<String>) () -> {
    final String s = myMethod();
    return s;
}).get();

So you keep the compiler happy but the desire to force only final retention
of the reference (which, like Raffaello, I don't understand the use-case
for) can be trivially circumvented.

--
Aaron Scott-Boddendijk


On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:09 AM Raffaello Giulietti <
raffaello.giulie...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I don't get why the author of myMethod() would/should be interested in
> forcing the caller of the method to declare the variable b to be final.
> Stated otherwise, what is the problem addressed by this suggestion?
> Have you some specific case in mind?
>
>
> Greetings
> Raffaello
>
>
> On 2022-02-02 20:27, Alberto Otero Rodríguez wrote:
> > I have a suggestion. I think it would be interesting creating constant
> methods in Java.
> >
> > I mean methods declared like this:
> >
> > public const String myMethod() {
> >    String a = "a";
> >    a = a + "b";
> >    return a;
> > }
> >
> > So that the response of the method is forced to be assigned to a final
> variable.
> >
> > This would be ok:
> > final String b = myMethod();
> >
> > But this would throw a compilation error:
> > String c = myMethod();
> >
> > What do you think? It's just an idea.
>