> Upon review of [8261407](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8261407), > by design, duplicate initialization of ReflectionFactory should be safe as it > performs side-effect-free property read actions, and the suggesting of making > the `initted` field volatile cannot prevent concurrent initialization either; > however, having `initted == true` published without the other fields' values > is a possibility, which this patch addresses. > > This simulates what's done in `CallSite`'s constructor for > `ConstantCallSite`. Please feel free to point out the problems with this > patch, as I am relatively inexperienced in this field of fences and there are > relatively less available documents. (Thanks to > https://shipilev.net/blog/2014/on-the-fence-with-dependencies/)
liach has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional commits since the last revision: - use peter's model of separate data object - Merge branch 'master' into 8261407-reflectionfactory - Include the stable annotation - Merge branch 'master' into 8261407-reflectionfactory - Merge branch '8261407-reflectionfactory' - Just use volatile directly to ensure read order - 8261407: ReflectionFactory.checkInitted() is not thread-safe ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6889/files - new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6889/files/f237cf50..12086557 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=6889&range=04 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=6889&range=03-04 Stats: 18301 lines in 782 files changed: 12300 ins; 3056 del; 2945 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6889.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6889/head:pull/6889 PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6889