On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:32:29 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Technically a constructor is not a Member either, but the reflection API can > get away with lumping constructors in with methods. > > The JLS definition of Member comes from 8.1.6 and 8.2 - the key definition > being in 8.1.6: > > "A class body may contain declarations of members of the class, that is, > fields (§8.3), methods (§8.4), classes (§8.5), and interfaces (§8.5)." Hmmm. Okay; I'll concede to the consensus here and withdraw the PR, CSR, etc. Parameter does mostly pass the "duck test" for me to be a Member, but I don't think it is essential for it to implement the interface (and also not essential to create one or more new interfaces separate from JLS terminology to characterize parameters and members/constructors as a more precise unified type than AnnotatedElement). Thanks. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7468
