On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 21:09:57 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This is an early review of changes to better model JVM access flags, that is 
>> "modifiers" like public, protected, etc. but explicitly at a VM level.
>> 
>> Language level modifiers and JVM level access flags are closely related, but 
>> distinct. There are concepts that overlap in the two domains (public, 
>> private, etc.), others that only have a language-level modifier (sealed), 
>> and still others that only have an access flag (synthetic).
>> 
>> The existing java.lang.reflect.Modifier class is inadequate to model these 
>> subtleties. For example, the bit positions used by access flags on different 
>> kinds of elements overlap (such as "volatile" for fields and "bridge" for 
>> methods. Just having a raw integer does not provide sufficient context to 
>> decode the corresponding language-level string. Methods like 
>> Modifier.methodModifiers() were introduced to cope with this situation.
>> 
>> With additional modifiers and flags on the horizon with projects like 
>> Valhalla, addressing the existent modeling deficiency now ahead of time is 
>> reasonable before further strain is introduced.
>> 
>> This PR in its current form is meant to give the overall shape of the API. 
>> It is missing implementations to map from, say, method modifiers to access 
>> flags, taking into account overlaps in bit positions.
>> 
>> The CSR https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8281660 will be filled in 
>> once the API is further along.
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge 
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in 
> by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional commits since 
> the last revision:
> 
>  - Reorder constants by mask value per review feedback.
>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8266670
>  - Respond to more review feedback.
>  - Respond to review feedback explicitly stating returned sets are immutable.
>  - Fix typo from review feedback.
>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8266670
>  - JDK-8266670: Better modeling of modifiers in core reflection

test/jdk/java/lang/reflect/AccessFlag/BasicAccessFlagTest.java line 65:

> 63:             if (left.mask() > right.mask()) {
> 64:                 throw new RuntimeException(left
> 65:                                            + "has a greater mas than "

Typo:
Suggestion:

                                           + "has a greater mask than "

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7445

Reply via email to