On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 08:12:46 GMT, Xiaohong Gong <xg...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The vector `"test"` api is implemented with vector `"compare"`. And the 
>> masked `"test" `is implemented with `"test(op).and(m)"` which means 
>> `"compare().and(m)"` finally. Since the masked vector `"compare"` has been 
>> optimized with predicated instruction for archituctures that support the 
>> feature, the masked `"test"` can also be optimized by implementing it with 
>> the predicated compare. This could save the additional ` "and"` for 
>> architectures that support the predicate feature.
>> 
>> This patch optimized the masked `"test"` by implementing it with masked 
>> `"compare"`. With this patch, the following codes for the` "IS_NEGATIVE"` op 
>> for a DoubleVector with SVE:
>> 
>>   mov z19.d, #0
>>   cmpgt   p1.d, p7/z, z19.d, z17.d
>>   and p0.b, p7/z, p1.b, p0.b
>> 
>> are optimized to:
>> 
>>   mov z19.d, #0
>>   cmpgt   p0.d, p0/z, z19.d, z17.d
>> 
>> Also update the jtreg tests for masked` "test" ` to make sure they are hot 
>> enough to be compiled by c2.
>
> Xiaohong Gong has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Simply the testTemplate

I guess the following:
`mask.cast(IntVector.species(shape())`
is more efficient than:
`m.cast(vspecies().asIntegral()))`
?

-------------

Marked as reviewed by psandoz (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7654

Reply via email to