On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:33:53 GMT, Naoto Sato <na...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Supporting `IsoFields` temporal fields in chronologies that are similar to >> ISO chronology. Corresponding CSR has also been drafted. > > Naoto Sato has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge > or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in > by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 11 additional commits since > the last revision: > > - abstract class -> top level interface > - interface -> abstract class > - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8279185 > - Removed the method > - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8279185 > - Changed to use a type to determine ISO based or not > - Renamed the new method > - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8279185 > - Addresses review comments > - copyright year fix > - ... and 1 more: > https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/30616d77...7f596789 Looks good to me. For the name, another option might be IsoCompatible instead of IsoBased as historically those other calendars were established before the ISO standard, although technically, in the Java language, it could be said the xChronology is ISO based. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7683
