On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 21:51:32 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Do you really need to define a real `FillerObject.java` class? Can't you use 
> an internal-only variant of a hidden class to represent this?

I am not sure I understand this request, but of course I am open to try 
different approaches. An existing example would be fine to get me on track; but 
maybe I am only not understanding your terminology: do you mean to have a 
special subclass of instanceKlass for `FillerObject`?
I had that, but that has been much much more effort (in terms of code, 
maintainability, ...) than having such an additional Java class file in the JDK 
and use the existing macros to use it everywhere.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8156

Reply via email to