On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 22:24:26 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> To enable more complete doclint checking (courtesy @jonathan-gibbons), please > review this PR to add type-level @param tags where they are missing. > > To the maintainers of java.util.concurrent, those changes could be separated > out in another bug if that would ease maintenance of that code. > > Making these library fixes is a blocker for correcting and expanding the > doclint checks (JDK-8285496). > > I'll update copyright years before pushing. Hi Joe, just two suggestions about the javax.management changes. Otherwise looks good! src/java.management/share/classes/javax/management/openmbean/ArrayType.java line 96: > 94: * > 95: * @param <T> the Java type that instances described by this type must > 96: * have. Instead of "instances" - would it be more correct to say "array elements"? src/java.management/share/classes/javax/management/openmbean/SimpleType.java line 60: > 58: * @param <T> the Java type that instances described by this type must > 59: * have. > 60: * I would suggest to say "that values described by this type"... ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8410