On Tue, 10 May 2022 09:57:48 GMT, Jan Lahoda <jlah...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> 8262889: Compiler implementation for Record Patterns
>> A first version of a patch that introduces record patterns into javac as a 
>> preview feature. For the specification, please see:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/jep427+405/jep427+405-20220426/specs/patterns-switch-record-patterns-jls.html
>> There are two notable tricky parts:
>> -in the parser, it was necessary to improve the `analyzePattern` method to 
>> handle nested/record patterns, while still keeping error recovery reasonable
>> -in the `TransPatterns`, the desugaring of the record patterns is very 
>> straightforward - effectivelly the record patterns are desugared into 
>> guards/conditions. This will likely be improved in some future 
>> version/preview
>> `MatchException` has been extended to cover additional cases related to 
>> record patterns.
> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
>   Fixing (non-)exhaustiveness for enum.

The dependent pull request has now been integrated, and the target branch of 
this pull request has been updated. This means that changes from the dependent 
pull request can start to show up as belonging to this pull request, which may 
be confusing for reviewers. To remedy this situation, simply merge the latest 
changes from the new target branch into this pull request by running commands 
similar to these in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout patterns-record-deconstruction3
git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# if there are conflicts, follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push


PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8516

Reply via email to