On Thu, 26 May 2022 16:04:17 GMT, Maxim Kartashev <mkartas...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Following the logic from the comment directly above the changed line, since >> it doesn't matter which controller we pick, pick any available controller >> instead of the one called "memory" specifically. This way we are guarded >> against getting `null` as `anyController`, which is being immediately passed >> down to `CgroupV2Subsystem.getInstance()` that is unprepared to accept >> `null` values. >> >> It is also worth noting that the previous checks (such as that at line 89) >> make sure that there exist at least one controller in the map. > > Maxim Kartashev has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > Made requested changes I tested the patch in our CI pipeline. All container tests passed. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8803
