On Tue, 31 May 2022 19:30:07 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:

>> `List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with 
>> smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when 
>> called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2.
>> In general replacement of `Arrays.asList()` with `List.of()` is dubious as 
>> the latter is null-hostile, however in some cases we are sure that arguments 
>> are non-null. Into this PR I've included the following cases (in addition to 
>> those where the argument is proved to be non-null at compile-time):
>> - `MethodHandles.longestParameterList()` never returns null
>> - parameter types are never null
>> - interfaces used for proxy construction and returned from 
>> `Class.getInterfaces()` are never null
>> - exceptions types of method signature are never null
> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains six commits:
>  - 8282662: Revert wrong copyright year change
>  - 8282662: Revert ProxyGenerator
>  - 8282662: Revert ProxyGenerator
>  - 8282662: Revert dubious changes in MethodType
>  - 8282662: Revert dubious changes
>  - 8282662: Use List/Set.of() factory methods to save memory

Merging is preferable, it doesn't disturb the history.
Usually an explicit merge is not necessary; Skara will indicate when an 
automatic merge is needed due to conflicts.
If you want to run your own tests then use a merge, not rebase.


PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7729

Reply via email to