On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 01:52:13 GMT, Naoto Sato <na...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> JapaneseChronology is an IsoChronology so run the test again (before >> committing) to make sure. > > `JapaneseChronology` is not extending `IsoChronology`, and that is the gist > of the change I suggested. I added the testcase of IsoChronology and it also passed. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16033#discussion_r1398309517
