On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:01:30 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> So what is the target package for this utility class? > >> So what is the target package for this utility class? > > If you really want a utility class then a non-public class in java.io is > okay. However, I think the starting point for this change is not the utility > class, it's about deciding whether to relax the check on the target or do > nothing. The concerns with BIS and BAIS do overlap but they are not > identical. More specifically, for BAIS, the underlying byte[] can outlive the > BAIS object. For BIS, transferTo may return a positive value more than once > because the underlying stream is growing. These are the details that need to > be worked through. @AlanBateman Why not using com.sun as we did it with other internal classes like ChannelInputStream etc.? Regarding your last sentence actually I do not see what "return a positive value more than once" has to do with the actual changed proposed by this PR? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16879#discussion_r1425523315
