On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 09:14:14 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs <eir...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please consider this PR which makes `DeflaterOutputStream.close()` always >> close its wrapped output stream. >> >> Currently, closing of the wrapped output stream happens outside the finally >> block where `finish()` is called. If `finish()` throws, this means the >> wrapped stream will not be closed. This can potentially lead to leaking >> resources such as file descriptors or sockets. >> >> This fix is to move the closing of the wrapped stream inside the finally >> block. >> >> Specification: This change brings the implementation of >> `DeflaterOutputStream.close()` in line with its specification: *Writes >> remaining compressed data to the output stream and closes the underlying >> stream.* >> >> Risk: This is a behavioural change. There is a small risk that existing code >> depends on the close method not following its specification. >> >> Testing: The PR adds a new JUnit 5 test `CloseWrappedStream.java` which >> simulates the failure condition and verifies that the wrapped stream was >> closed under failing and non-failing conditions. > > Eirik Bjørsnøs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Prevent IOException thrown during finish() from being lost if an > IOException is thrown while closing the wrapped stream src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/zip/DeflaterOutputStream.java line 257: > 255: } catch (IOException ioe) { > 256: if (finishException != ioe) { > 257: ioe.addSuppressed(finishException); A null check for `finishException` will be needed here to prevent a `NullPointerException` being thrown from within `addSuppressed`. I think it's better to just copy over (rest of) the finally block from `FilterOutputStream`'s close() method. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17209#discussion_r1439328181