On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 04:37:45 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Hello Vamsi (@vamsi-parasa), >> >> Could you please run the new benchmarking? >> To save time and don't patch JDK several times, I've created >> JavaBenchmarkHarness >> class which is under package java.util and compares several versions of DPQS. >> Also I prepared several versions of current sorting source from JDK to >> detect what is going wrong. >> >> What you need is to compile and run JavaBenchmarkHarness once: >> >> javac --patch-module java.base=. -d classes *.java >> java -XX:CompileThreshold=1 -XX:-TieredCompilation --patch-module >> java.base=classes -cp classes java.util.JavaBenchmarkHarness >> >> Find the sources there: >> >> https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/JavaBenchmarkHarness.java >> >> https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_b01.java >> https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_b01_ins.java >> https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_b01_mrg.java >> https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_b01_piv.java >> https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_b01_prt.java >> https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_r29p.java >> https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_r29p5.java >> >> Thank you, >> Vladimir > > Hi Vladimir (@iaroslavski), > > Please see the data below: > > Thanks, > Vamsi > > > > name | builder | size | mode | count | score > -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- > b01 | RANDOM | 600 | avg | 325677 | 6.862 > b01 | RANDOM | 3000 | avg | 52041 | 82.233 > b01 | RANDOM | 90000 | avg | 1217 | 4456.51 > b01 | RANDOM | 400000 | avg | 242 | 22923.28 > b01 | RANDOM | 1000000 | avg | 90 | 60598.84 > b01 | REPEATED | 600 | avg | 651354 | 1.933 > b01 | REPEATED | 3000 | avg | 104083 | 13.753 > b01 | REPEATED | 90000 | avg | 2435 | 723.039 > b01 | REPEATED | 400000 | avg | 484 | 3084.416 > b01 | REPEATED | 1000000 | avg | 180 | 8234.428 > b01 | STAGGER | 600 | avg | 1954062 | 1.005 > b01 | STAGGER | 3000 | avg | 312251 | 4.945 > b01 | STAGGER | 90000 | avg | 7305 | 133.126 > b01 | STAGGER | 400000 | avg | 1453 | 592.144 > b01 | STAGGER | 1000000 | avg | 542 | 1493.876 > b01 | SHUFFLE | 600 | avg | 325677 | 5.12 > b01 | SHUFFLE | 3000 | avg | 52041 | 29.252 > b01 | SHUFFLE | 90000 | avg | 1217 | 1396.664 > b01 | SHUFFLE | 400000 | avg | 242 | 5743.489 > b01 | SHUFFLE | 1000000 | avg | 90 | 15490.81 > b01_ins | RANDOM | 600 | avg | 325677 | 7.594 > b01_ins | RANDOM | 3000 | avg | 52041 | 78.631 > b01_ins | RANDOM | 90000 | avg | 1217 | 4312.511 > b01_ins | RANDOM | 400000 | avg | 242 | 22108.18 > b01_ins | RANDOM | 1000000 | avg | 90 | 58467.16 > b01_ins | REPEATED | 600 | avg | 651354 | 1.569 > b01_ins | REPEATED | 3000 | avg | 104083 | 11.313 > b01_ins | REPEATED | 90000 | avg | 2435 | 720.838 > b01_ins | REPEATED | 400000 | avg | 484 | 3003.673 > b01_ins | REPEATED | 1000000 | avg | 180 | 8144.944 > b01_ins | STAGGER | 600 | avg | 1954062 | 0.98 > b01_ins | STAGGER | 3000 | avg | 312251 | 4.948 > b01_ins | STAGGER | 90000 | avg | 7305 | 132.909 > b01_ins | STAGGER | 400000 | avg | 1453 | 592.572 > b01_ins | STAGGER | 1000000 | avg | 542 | 1492.627 > b01_ins | SHUFFLE | 600 | avg | 325677 | 4.092 > b01_ins | SHUFFLE | 3000 | avg | 52041 | 27.138 > b01_ins | SHUFFLE | 90000 | avg | 1217 | 1304.326 > b01_ins | SHUFFLE | 400000 | avg | 242 | 5465.745 > b01_ins | SHUFFLE | 1000000 | avg | 90 | 14585.08 > b01_mrg | RANDOM | 600 | avg | 325677 | 7.139 > b01_mrg | RANDOM | 3000 | avg | 52041 | 81.01 > b01_mrg | RANDOM | 90000 | avg | 1217 | 4266.084 > b01_mrg | RANDOM | 400000 | avg | 242 | 21937.77 > b01_mrg | RANDOM | 1000000 | avg | 90 | 58177.72 > b01_mrg | REPEATED | 600 | avg | 651354 | 1.36 > b01_mrg | REPEATED | 3000 | avg | 104083 | 9.013 > b01_mrg | REPEATED | 90000 | avg | 2435 | 737.684 > b01_mrg | REPEATED | 400000 | avg | 484 | 3152.447 > b01_mrg | REPEATED | 1000000 | avg |... Hello Vamsi (@vamsi-parasa), Could you please run the new benchmarking to detect the best case for Radix sort and parallel sorting? What you need is to compile and run JavaBenchmarkHarness: javac --patch-module java.base=. -d classes *.java java -XX:CompileThreshold=1 -XX:-TieredCompilation --patch-module java.base=classes -cp classes java.util.JavaBenchmarkHarness Find the sources there: https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_b01.java https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_r30.java https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_r30_a.java https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_r30_11.java https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_r30_12.java https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_r30_13.java https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_r30_14.java https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_r30_21.java https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_r30_23.java https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/JavaBenchmarkHarness.java Thank you, Vladimir ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13568#issuecomment-2087504178
