On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:20:31 GMT, fabioromano1 <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The aim is not about having even more efficient code (yours is already >> faster than the existing algorithm), but to have simpler code. >> >> The two denormalization code snippets, while based on the same underlying >> math, are quite different in shape. Having just one denormalization code >> should be easier to read, understand, check, compare to the paper, and >> (possibly) evolve. > > @rgiulietti I simplified the code to fit the normalization/unnormalization > with that of the paper's C code. @fabioromano1 I'll resume reviewing the PR sometimes next week, so you have some days left for some last-minute enhancements ;-) ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19710#issuecomment-2252605117
