On Mon, 2 Sep 2024 16:34:07 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti <rgiulie...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Right, I didn't remember that `BigInteger` has its own implementation. > > However, reducing `MutableBigIntegerBox` to just a bunch of accessors to use > in the unit test and the benchmarks should still be possible. Then having two > copies of that class should be less of an issue. @rgiulietti Yes, however there is still the problem of how to get instances of `MutableBigInteger`, since it is not a public class... ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20008#issuecomment-2325088461
