On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 04:08:28 GMT, Claes Redestad <redes...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> fix comment > > Always good to see some methods removed from `JavaLangAccess` - but it > appears these are already unused? > > I think the performance gain from this is somewhat underwhelming. `Unsafe` is > a big hammer to eek out ~10% performance in an isolated code path. > > And perhaps it would be better to just push the microbenchmark, any code > cleanups (like the removal of unused methods from JavaLangAccess) and leave > code unchanged and leave it as a challenge for JIT engineers to get the > pre-existing code to parity with this `Unsafe` routine. > > That said I'm ok with this as is but will request a second opinion. Maybe > @rgiulietti can weigh in? @cl4es I think you need to re-review for this PR to move to 100% approved ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22023#issuecomment-2603964029
