On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 14:33:27 GMT, Jorn Vernee <jver...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> In that case, won't the root form be customized and the table switch names >> be inlined into the root form? > > The root would e.g. have a constant BMH pointing at a _shared_ tableSwitch > LF. So, the BMH fields would be seen as constant as well, including the list > of cases. The issue is that the bytecode of the tableSwitch BMH will not be > using the intrinsic, since it's not customized itself, i.e. it will only have > a single call site for all cases. I think we could get around this by always wrapping the `tableSwitch` MH in an `exactInvoker`, which adds the customization check for its callee. It would mean we will also separately customize any tableSwitch MH that's part of a larger chain. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23763#discussion_r1979591207
