On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 14:22:22 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Is it impossible for another compliant implementation of Java SE to do so? > > It's hard for me to guess what prompted that question, but I'll take a guess > - are you asking this question to decide whether we should reword the > pre-existing javadoc on these constructors to explicitly state that a new > decompressor/compressor instance gets created for each instance of the > stream? If so, then my opinion is that we shouldn't change that part of the > existing doc. > > If you meant something else, then please add the details and we can decide if > any additional changes are necessary to the text. My opinion is that: if it is possible for another implementation to share the backing in/deflator (such as via thread-local instances) that does not always need to be closed when an in/output stream is closed, then we should not specify in a way that rules out such an implementation. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23655#discussion_r2023022774
