> This PR proposes to add some `@ForceInline` annotations in the `Module` class > in order to assist inlining of FFM var/method handles. > > There are also some changes in other classes (notably `j.l.Object`) which, if > implemented, can take us four additional levels of inlining. However, there > is a tradeoff with adding `@ForceInline` and just trying to get as deep as > possible for a specific use case is probably not the best idea. > > So, we should discuss which of the proposed changes (if any), we'd like to > integrate. > > Tested and passed tier1-3
Per Minborg has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains nine additional commits since the last revision: - Revert copyright year - Revert changes to Object - Merge branch 'master' into module-force-inline - Add more @ForceInline and a benchmark - Remove reformatting - Remove file - Revert change - Rename method and variable - Add @ForceInline annotations and restructure some methods ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23460/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23460/files/7a2f7f89..401d9d4f Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=23460&range=05 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=23460&range=04-05 Stats: 212749 lines in 4960 files changed: 98853 ins; 86637 del; 27259 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23460.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23460/head:pull/23460 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23460
