On Wed, 14 May 2025 18:16:08 GMT, Roger Riggs <rri...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Maybe a good idea at this point if @mkarg could provide an example of server >> code benefitting from returning a CharSequence... > > The result should be immutable and CharSequence does not provide that. > The contents should not be modifiable after the method returns. A "pure" `CharSequence` *is* immutable, as it does not have mutation methods. Also, why *should* the result be immutable? If someone wants to return a `StringBuilder` for example (for whatever intent), why shouldn't he allowed to do that? In fact, it would be beneficial to return a `StringBuilder` in some cases, as it is more efficient to modify (*iff* wanted) than a `String`. It should be up to the caller and the provider of the implementation to decide about immutability; this is not the API's discretion. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24728#discussion_r2089617093
