On Mon, 26 May 2025 19:20:06 GMT, Shaojin Wen <s...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Through JVM Option +PrintInlining, we found that String has a constructor >> codeSize of 852, which is too large. This caused failed to inline. >> >> The following is the output information of PrintInlining: >> >> @ 9 java.lang.String::<init> (12 bytes) inline (hot) >> !m @ 1 java.nio.charset.Charset::defaultCharset (52 bytes) >> inline (hot) >> ! @ 8 java.lang.String::<init> (852 bytes) failed to >> inline: hot method too big >> >> >> In Java code, the big method that cannot be inlined is the following >> constructor >> >> >> String(Charset charset, byte[] bytes, int offset, int length) {} >> >> The above String constructor is too large; break it down into smaller >> methods with a codeSize under 325 to allow them to be inlined by the C2. > > Shaojin Wen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > from @liach This looks like a good first step for bringing parity to string decoding and encoding methods. ------------- Marked as reviewed by liach (Reviewer). PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25290#pullrequestreview-2951343600