On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 17:06:44 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> CatchBuilder has a simple check for duplicate catch types. However, this >> check is never comprehensive as it still allows subtypes covered by >> supertypes, and covering that would be too costly; in addition, the >> "illegal" duplicate catch types are still valid `class` files. We should >> remove this duplicate catch type check, and compensate with documentation on >> the effects of duplicate types. > > Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Wrong ref Looks good to me. ------------- Marked as reviewed by asotona (Reviewer). PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26372#pullrequestreview-3075170838
