On Mon, 1 Sep 2025 09:24:45 GMT, Emanuel Peter <epe...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Yeah I'd like to work on it. Seems like a good one to work in between bigger >> tasks. >> >> I had a question about it though. I noticed that `STORE_VECTOR` is also in a >> similar situation. Any specific reason to leave that one as is? Or was it >> just an oversight? If an oversight, a second RFE could be added for that one? > > It would probably also be good if we did stores as well, yes. But you'll > touch many many tests, having to specify the type of the store. Still I would > say it is worth it š I've created [JDK-8366531](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8366531) for `VectorReinterpret` and [JDK-8366532](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8366532) for `StoreVector`. I've assigned `VectorReinterpret` one to myself and I left the other one unassigned for someone else to maybe pick it in the future? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26457#discussion_r2313446621
