On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 03:15:55 GMT, Chen Liang <[email protected]> wrote:
> This solution, if it is to be accepted, can only be a stopgap measure - I > think the most likely feature to replace this hack would be String Templates. > What abilities do you think that String Templates should support so that you > can cover this use case (when we migrate the DateTimeFormatter to be String > template instead of StringBuilder based)? j.t.f.DateTimeFormatterBuilder$CompositePrinterParser supports nesting and Optional, StringTempldate does not support these capabilities. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26911#issuecomment-3310102118
