On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 09:25:11 GMT, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> That's just the result of a mechanical conversion of the original >> testng-based code. > > Okay, but you could go the extra mile and replace the throw of > RuntimeException as it looks very strange to have the test be a JUnit test > and still have this. It is my plan to review all numerics related tests, rewriting some of those that do not use any framework to use junit in the end. For now, the priority is to remove the dependencies on testng. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28848#discussion_r2626271021
