On Fri, 26 Dec 2025 11:09:30 GMT, Emanuel Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi @eme64 , I’d really appreciate hearing your thoughts on this when you >> have a moment. > > Honestly, I'd just make it an assert, if your code currently does not expect > it. That will force us to look at the example that would eventually violate the assert, and evaluate the situation. Maybe it would reveal a bug (and we could catch and fix it). Maybe it is a new pattern that means we have to rethink things more widely. Or maybe we'd just convert it back to a condition, but at least at that point we'd have an example that takes the other branch. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28313#discussion_r2648050276
