On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 15:18:00 GMT, Doug Lea <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Changes signal filtering to avoid possible starvation
>
> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Change signalWork fencing; in-progress activation changes
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 1961:
> 1959: if (q.base == b) { // else
> inconsistent
> 1960: if (t == null) {
> 1961: if (q.array == a) { // else
> resized
@DougLea Do we have any good sense of how "far behind" a completed resize a
worker can end up being (i.e. looking at an array that has been replaced
already)? I'm just thinking if the rescanning is spending cycles looking at the
wrong thing.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28797#discussion_r2673120173
