On Sat, 28 Mar 2026 02:24:14 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga <[email protected]> wrote:
> On the review for [JDK-8380955](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8380955) > (#30443), `Linker` and `FunctionDescriptor` do not need to be value based > class because they would not be treated as "value". > `Linker` is defined as providing a way to look up the canonical layouts > associated with the data types used by the ABI. `FunctionDescriptor` > represents the signature of a foreign function. They are not "value". > > Actually they and their child (final) classes do not have `@ValueBased`, thus > `javac` and `-XX:DiagnoseSyncOnValueBasedClasses` cannot identify if they are > used in anti-pattern of value based class. Thus this change does not change > behavior, just documentation updates. Can someone review this? I'm still thinking this change is reasonable. I want to apply this into JDK 27, so I think we have to reach the conclusion within a month because RDP 1 is approaching. Comments are welcome. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30481#issuecomment-4384524290
