> This PR proposes to add a new `default` method `List::removeAt`.
> 
> There are two overloads of the method `List::remove`, and if the list is of 
> type `List<Integer>`, the overload resolution could pick a surprising variant.
> 
> Hence, it is better to add a separate method that removes an element based on 
> its index.
> 
> It is proposed that the `E remove(int index)` method is _not_ `@Deprecated`. 
> Instead, we add verbiage to promote the new method over the old one.
> 
> ---------
> - [X] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  Revert import

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31064/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31064/files/1288ff1e..d0ef2ae3

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=31064&range=05
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=31064&range=04-05

  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 1 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31064.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/31064/head:pull/31064

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31064

Reply via email to