When you factor in colo, power, configuration, and administration costs,
fewer boxes is always cheaper. I'm not expecting a 2x speedup for the
extra CPU, but I'm curious what the hit is.
Ted Dunning wrote:
Doesn't the incremental CPU cost you as much as an entire extra box?
On 2/12/08 12:19 PM, "Colin Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The big question for me is how well a dual-CPU 4-core (8 cores per box)
configuration will do. Has anyone tried out this configuration with
Intel or AMD CPUs? Is the memory throughput sufficient?
