This is pretty strange, particularly the line that says this:

 Under-replicated blocks:       0 (0.0 %)

Is the word MISSING actually not in your output?



On 5/15/08 12:15 PM, "C G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Earlier this week I wrote about a master node crash and our efforts to recover
> from the crash.  We recovered from the crash and all systems are normal.
> However, I have a concern about what fsck is reporting and what it really
> means for a filesystem to be marked "corrupt."
>    
>   With the mapred engine shut down, I ran fsck / -files -blocks -locations to
> inspect the file system.  The output looks clean with the exception of this at
> the end of the output:
>    
>   Status: CORRUPT
>  Total size:    5113667836544 B
>  Total blocks:  1070996 (avg. block size 4774684 B)
>  Total dirs:    50012
>  Total files:   1027089
>  Over-replicated blocks:        0 (0.0 %)
>  Under-replicated blocks:       0 (0.0 %)
>  Target replication factor:     3
>  Real replication factor:       3.0
>   
> The filesystem under path '/' is CORRUPT
>    
>   In reviewing the fsck output, there are no obvious errors being reported.  I
> see tons of output like this:
>    
>   /foo/bar/part-00005 3387058, 6308 block(s):  OK
> 0. 4958936159429948772 len=3387058 repl=3 [10.2.14.5:50010, 10.2.14.20:50010,
> 10.2.14.8:50010]
>    
>   and the only status ever reported is "OK."
>    
>   So this begs the question about what causes HDFS to declare the FS is
> "corrupt" and how do I clear this up?
>    
>   The second question, assuming that I can't make the "corrupt" state go away,
> concerns running an upgrade.  If every file in HDFS reports "OK" but the FS
> reports "corrupt", is it safe to undertake an upgrade from 0.15.x to 0.16.4 ?
>    
>   Thanks for any help....
>   C G
>    
> 
>        

Reply via email to