I am new to Hadoop.  So take this information with a grain of salt.
But the power of Hadoop is breaking down big problems into small pieces and
spreading it across many (thousands) of machines, in effect creating a
massively parallel processing engine.

But in order to take advantage of that functionality you must write your
application to take advantage of it, using the Hadoop frameworks.

So if I understand  your dilemma correctly.  I do not think that Hadoop is
for you, unless you want to re-write your app to take advantage of it.  And
I suspect that if you have access to a traditional cluster, that will be a
better alternative for you.

Hope that this helps some.

-John


On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Igor Nikolic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello list
>
> We will be getting access to a cluster soon, and I was wondering whether
> this I should use Hadoop ?  Or am I better of with the usual batch
> schedulers such as ProActive etc ? I am not a CS/CE person, and from reading
> the website I can not get a sense of whether hadoop is for me.
>
> A little background:
> We have a  relatively large agent based simulation ( 20+ MB jar) that needs
> to be swept across very large parameter spaces. Agents communicate only
> within the simulation, so there is no interprocess communication. The
> parameter vector is max 20 long , the simulation may take 5-10 minutes on a
> normal desktop and it might return a few mb of raw data. We need 10k-100K
> runs, more if possible.
>
>
>
> Thanks for advice, even a short yes/no is welcome
>
> Greetings
> Igor
>
> --
> ir. Igor Nikolic
> PhD Researcher
> Section Energy & Industry
> Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management
> Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
>
> Tel: +31152781135
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web: http://www.igornikolic.com
> wiki server: http://wiki.tudelft.nl
>
>


-- 
John Martyniak
Before Dawn Solutions, Inc.
9457 S. University Blvd. #266
Highlands Ranch, CO 80126
o: 1-877-499-1562 x707 (Toll Free)
c: 303-522-1756
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: http://www.beforedawn.com

Reply via email to